Beacon Transcript – On-call scheduling will no longer be used by six new retailers as the technique and its users are being looked into and contested by many more.
The decision should come to advantage workers. On-call scheduling is a method used by many retailers. It is sometimes called on-call shifts. It involved irregular hours and unpredictable work scheduled.
Basically, a retailer worker is not sure when they will work. Typically, such a worker would have to make or expect a call before a shift. As such, they would find out if they will be needed at work.
Employees assigned to such shifts have a highly irregular program. The program is tiresome and quite taxing, especially for adults. Such workers would have no way of scheduling their day in advance.
The method has come under quite some scrutiny. Both employees, regulators, and labor groups are demanding an end to on-call scheduling.
A number of about seven states are trying to take measures against it. The District of Columbia is also involved. Eric Schneiderman, the New York Attorney General, is one of the lead figures in the movement.
Together with other state officials, he has sent letters. These demanded from the respective retailer to put a stop to this scheduling.
Such letters seem to have had an effect. Six new retailers will be renouncing the practice. Their decision was announced this Tuesday. As such, they will be joining an increasing retailer category.
Such category members have agreed to stop on-call scheduling. They should now be offering more predictable hours. The six new retailers have reportedly received inquiries on the matter.
They include the following. Carter’s, The Disney Store, David’s Tea, Zumlez, PacSun, and Aeropostale. Amongst them, 4 also agreed to an additional measure. They will be setting schedules in advance. These should be released at least a week ahead of the shift.
As such, the workers will be able to plan their time. The only two not to impose this new rule are PacSun and Aeropostale.
Attorney General Schneiderman responded to the announcement. He applauded the retailers for their decision. Schneiderman also gave them as an example, one to follow.
He does not consider on-call shifts a necessity. Furthermore, he considers them a thing of the past. Retailer workers should not be forced to keep their day open. Adults with children would find it hard to manage. And time lost waiting for the shift announcement is not compensated.
On-call scheduling is also somehow conflicting with the law. In this case, the New York state law. As such, its contesters had a legal reason for addressing the retailers.
New York laws agreed on a “call-in pay” statute. This would require situation-specific employee payments. More exactly, employers would have to pay workers if they report to work in call-ins. They would have to be paid the equivalent of more than 4 hours.
Such a law should help discourage companies from forcefully calling-in employees. Similar laws are already being considered.
The six new retailers are not the only ones to have made this decision. Last year saw a number of other such announcements. They came from Victoria’s Secret, Gap, and Bath & Body Works. J. Crew, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Urban Outfitters made the same announcement.
These all decided to stop their on-call scheduling practices. They also reportedly received inquiries before making the decision.
Neither of the six new retailers has as yet released an official statement on the matter.
Image Source: Wikimedia